Communities of Practice: creating learning environments

  • Published on
    14-Dec-2014

  • View
    2.392

  • Download
    1

DESCRIPTION

This presentation is a summary on the processes inside our Communication and Multimedia Design bachelor programme at the NHL university of applied sciences in Leeuwarden, the Netherlands. I hope it may be of any inspiration to you. If so please drop a comment!

Transcript

1. Communities of Practice Creating learning environments Martin Kuipers 2. what is it about? - competence based learning - exible learning routes - communities of practice 3. Leeuwarden University of applied science s - 10.000 students - Bachelor degree programmes - Engineering - Social studies (health, education) - Business & management - Built environment - Communication - Communication & Multimedia Design 4. Communication & Multimedia Design - 4 year programme - 240 european credits - degree: bachelor of multimedia Basicly: we learn people to create multimedia products like: - (educational) games - advanced web applications - 3d visualizations - crossmedia broadcastings - new medial concepts (multitouch, blended forms of media) 5. our learning cycle student - self directed learning - competence based - interdisciplinary projectgroups - learning to learn 6. matchmaking ? client/company student - external (paying) clients - ambitions, passions - matching with authentic projects - own projects 7. intake ! mentor + expert student - the project starts with an intake assessment - the starting level is discussed - attitude - repeating the trick? vs learning new things! 8. working in teams - all students work in teams (5/6/7) - (almost) no individual projects... - different roles: project manager, art direction, lead programmer, designer, developer. - Every student gets personal feedback and results 9. coaching + planning mentor student - every student has a personal coach: mentor - discussion about ambitions - personal issues - activating, stimulating - students formulate their plans 10. consulting feedback! 50% question? client expert student - questions and problems are discussed - feedback on projectplan, prototype, products - experts give leads to knowledge sources - students maintain contact with client - mid-term assessment: adjustment and feedback 11. progress 75% mentor tutor student - progress is monitored and discussed by mentor and tutor 12. peer assessment peers student - peer assessments result in feedback on personal attitude within the group 13. the assessment (show and tell) 100% tell! peers student client experts mentor - all involved have a meeting - the product is presented to the client and experts - students show and tell why they are competent - students are responsible for brining evidence 14. feedback and reection expert expert student mentor - feedback is passed to the student - rewarded with credits. (+/- 30 each project) - the student makes a nal reection on the feedback - and from this reection a new plan is formed 15. PdP matchmaking consulting planning monitoring coaching plan do results + feedback + new projects ! evidence + professioal prole react check reecting make assessment advizing rewarding reection 16. A few numbers - 700 students in 6 cohorts - 60 personell - most of them part time - aim: 25 students, 1 coach - no paper exams - assessments are transactionpoint - 42 competencies... - 3 levels each... - too many communication channels 17. How to organize all this? lessons learned in exible route learning 18. 2000-2006, reality on paper: year: project 1 project 2 project 3 project 4 Propedeutic 2 project 5* project 6* project 7* authentic 3 internship authentic authentic shopping (external) graduation 4 bottom line: educators want predicable timeframes 19. shoppin 2000-2006, reality. g (exte rn year: project 1 project 2 project 3 Propedeutic ? authentic project 5* 2 project 4 internship 3 own starting company ? $$$ project 6 4 bottom line: students are exible, we arent... graduation 20. organization... 3th oor 2nd oor external at home ? 21. creating a new organization: ! - minimizing the time and location difference - no distinction in years - create groups working on the same type of projects - shifting management to CoP leaders 22. vertical alignment vs horizontal alignment project 1 project 2 project 3 project 4 propedeutic year 2 year 3 Community of practice. Community of practice year 4 time internship graduate 23. 3de verdieping 2de verdieping extern thuis 24. observations: - more students at school - making longer days - share and learn with eachother - average number of credits is rising 25. dos: - create a homebase - create simple but strict rules - work towards a culture of equality - in a CoP their are no big differences between students and experts... 26. dos: - set conditions for spontaneous contacts - coffeemachine is the heart of the organization :) - celebrate successes - listen to your students 27. donts - if you want CoP to work, avoid top down organization - trust your students, at rst things will be shaky, but in time something beautiful grows. - dont be to good at it, otherwise people wont leave :-) 28. our next steps - starting CoP in the propedeutic year - fading borders between student + expert - allow students to form own CoPs - allow students to self-manage CoPs - experts/educators participating instead of leading - nd better ICT tools and improve internal communication 29. tnx. martin@mrtnk.nl

Recommended

View more >