China and its friends push tiger farm idea

  • Published on

  • View

  • Download


  • This week

    COULD farming tigers prevent wild ones from being hunted into extinction? That is the claim made this week by the Liberty Institute, a free-market think tank based in New Delhi, India. It makes conservationists fear that China is preparing to vastly expand tiger farming so that tiger body parts, used in traditional medicines, and skins can be sold on the international market.

    The Liberty Institute estimates that about 4000 tigers are being reared in a handful of Chinese farms. Chinese law forbids the killing of these animals, so

    breeders are supposed to wait until the tigers die of natural causes before selling their parts, says Eric Dinerstein, chief scientist for the conservation organisation WWF, based in Washington DC.

    Several conservation groups say that China may be preparing to lift such restrictions and start trading tiger parts internationally. It wants to open up the market, says Debbie Banks of campaign group the Environmental Investigation Agency in London.

    Barun Mistra, managing trustee of the Liberty Institute, says the grounds for farming tigers are sound. In a talk on

    China and its friends push tiger farm idea

    16 | NewScientist | 18 November 2006




    The Dawkins Prize was endowed by a generous donation fromthe family of Professor Richard Dawkins FRS, Oxford University'sCharles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding ofScience. The Prize is for outstanding research into the ecologyand behaviour of animals whose welfare and survival may beendangered by human activities.

    The first Prize-winner (2001) was Dr Iain Douglas-Hamilton, andthe second Prize-winner (2004) was Professor David Macdonald.

    The College now seeks nominations for the third Dawkins Prize.

    The Prize-winner will receive 2,000 and will be expected to giveone public lecture in Oxford. The College also hopes that aDawkins Prize Scholar will be chosen by the Prize-winner, toenable a student to gain research experience by working with himor her. 2,000 will be available to the Prize-winner for theScholarship and research expenses. In addition, the travelexpenses of the Prize-winner and Scholar will be met, up to atotal of 2,000.

    Nominations should contain names, addresses and affiliations ofnominator and nominee and a brief list of the key achievementsand publications of the nominee. Nominations should be sent to:The Vicegerent, Convenor of the Dawkins Prize Committee,Balliol College, Oxford OX1 3BJ, by 10th December 2006.

    A growing assetQILIAN




    Admission free no tickets or advancebooking required.

    Royal Society events arefrequently broadcast onthe web. Visit the videoarchive

    Registered Charity No 207043

    The Royal Society6-9 Carlton House TerraceLondon SW1Y 5AGTel: 020 7451 2683 Email:

    Tuesday 28 November at 6.30pm

    Chaired by Maggie Gee

    Are our human abilities and instinctsso very different from those of otheranimals? Nicky Clayton, from theUniversity of Cambridge, DorisLessing, widely regarded as one of the most important post-warwriters in England, Will Self, authorof Great Apes, and Andrew Whiten,from the University of St Andrews,will discuss what really distinguisheshuman beings from their fellowcreatures.

    In partnership with the Royal Society of Literature

    Mind the gap?

    061118_N_p16_p17_Breeding.indd 16061118_N_p16_p17_Breeding.indd 16 13/11/06 9:22:05 am13/11/06 9:22:05 am

  • 18 November 2006 | NewScientist | 17

    15 November in Washington DC, Mistra argued that commerce, not conservation, was needed to protect wild tigers. Mistra did not respond to New Scientists request for an interview, but his views, and the fact that he has worked closely with the Chinese authorities, are well known in conservation circles. He believes that by flooding the market with cheap farmed-tiger products, it will become uneconomic to hunt wild tigers, and millions of dollars can be raised to conserve them.

    China has been banging this drum for some time. Last month a Chinese official argued that farming bears for their bile has boosted their numbers in the wild (New Scientist, 14 October, p 6). The UK branch of the World Society for the Protection of Animals, based in London, disputes these claims and says that farming animals in this way perpetuates the illegal market.

    Dinerstein agrees. Describing Mistras proposals as insidious he says that legalising trade in endangered animal parts makes it more difficult to police the illegal trade. What is more, he says, people will still hunt tigers because wild tiger parts sell for more than those from farms.

    A Chinese delegate raised the issue at a recent committee meeting of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). They were proposing the opening of domestic trade in tiger parts, Banks says. However, CITES is only concerned with international trade, so there appeared to be no real purpose in the Chinese move. The Chinese were testing the water, Banks says.

    To take advantage of the huge overseas demand for tiger parts and start trading internationally, China would need approval from other CITES member states, says David Morgan, chief scientist to the CITES secretariat, based in Geneva, Switzerland. Whether it could gain such approval on the grounds of conservation remains to be seen.

    THIS WEEK 50 YEARS AGOThis is our policyMay we introduce ourselves and explain our aims? The New Scientist is published for all those who are interested in scientifi c discovery and in its industrial, commercial and social consequences. We who launch it believe we are doing so at a time when the need for such a magazine is obvious and urgent. We have been encouraged in our project by the approval in many cases, the enthusiasm of leaders of science and industry.

    The world has entered a phase of spectacular technological advances, but in many sections of industry output is hampered by a dour devotion to outdated methods, and science is treated as an intruder. A magazine such as this can act as a spearhead. Leading scientists will contribute articles explaining their work to the layman. We shall by no means confi ne ourselves to the industrial uses of science. For a branch of research which, today, appears as a purely abstract quest for knowledge, may turn out tomorrow to have a direct application to the happiness of us all.

    Besides, science is exciting; science can be entertaining. One of the hopes which inspires The New Scientist is that it may capture the imagination of young people who have latent scientifi c aptitudes, but are uncertain about the choice of a career. The best way to do this, we think, is to range in these pages over the whole fi eld of modern research.

    The task we have set ourselves is one which, in our opinion, is at present performed nowhere else in British journalism. Our endeavour will be to perform it conscientiously and readably.

    From The New Scientist, 22 November 1956





    Oris Frank Sinatra Date.

    Showtime in the classicSinatra Style.

    His highlights are unforgettable.Now a High-Mech movemententers the limelight. The OrisFrank Sinatra watch, with its

    date enlarged in the magnifying glass,evokes the timeless style of Sinatra. Itembodies the same nonchalance that dis-tinguished the great entertainer, from itsdynamic radial structured dial to the six-piece case that enables the flexible lugs toswing for perfect wearing comfort.

    Frank Sinatra the greatestentertainer of the 20th


    For further information and stockist details call 0800 214582 Fax 01204704155,

    Visible through the case back: the High-Mech red Oris rotor.

    Oris Frank Sinatra Date 645.


    k S






    ld E







    ts R







    m P

    . G



    061118_N_p16_p17_Breeding.indd 17061118_N_p16_p17_Breeding.indd 17 13/11/06 9:22:17 am13/11/06 9:22:17 am