Prosceuting the ineffacy of 18 USC 2257
This means that any current noncompliance with the 2257 Regulations is already subject to prosecution by the next administration.... This is a moot point, the problem is…
This means that any current noncompliance with the 2257 Regulations is already subject to prosecution by the next administration....
This is a moot point, the problem is omission, coverage, situations not covered or addressed, not noncompliance, this is why every court challenge is being won by the Government, the target is wrong, belvie it or not, THERE IS NO CASE WITH 18 USC 2257 WITH NON-COMPLIANCE, IF ANYTHING, THE GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN COMPLETELY COMPLIANT, THEY DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT BREAKING A PART OF A LAW, THAT IS NOT EVEN A LAW, NOT EVEN ADRESSED OR CONSIDERED, NON COMPLIANCE IS NOT THE ISSUE, CONSENT BY OMISSON IS: IT HAS TO BE PROVEN, BY THOSE, NOT ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THE LAW, OR POWERS THAT BE FOR VIOLATING, THE GAG (NOT WRITTEN, OR LEGAL, BUT VERBALLY IMPLIED) BUT STILL UPHELD CRIMINALLY BY ELEMENTS OF THE US GOVERNMENT, THAT THE MISSNG ELEMENT OF THE LAW AND THE VERY LAW ISTELF, THE WAY IT IS WRITTEN, IS THE VERY EVIDENCE NEEDED TO PROSECUTE, THAT AND A FEW VIDEOS TO BE PRESENTED (WITHOUT THE PERSONS IN THE VIDEOS KNOLWEDGE) BUT WITH THE PRODUCTION COMPANIES KNOWLEDGE OR WITNESSES TESTIMONY, THAT HAVE NOT BEEN VERBALLY THREATEND WITH FEDERAL PUNISHMENT.
WILLIAM ERWIN AUSTIN III